COLLEGIUMCOLLEGIUM
Space Doctors

JPL_TEAM_26a · Mixed method

Teaming Economics of Mission Program Execution Management: Which Partner Closes the JPL Capability Gap?

Against the JPL baseline of 4.0, the MITRE core scores 4.40; adding Partner 3 (JHU / APL) raises the team to 4.70, a exceeds of +0.70 and the largest marginal capability contribution (+0.30) among the three candidate partners. Falsifiable against the Overall = 0.30E + 0.30R + 0.40X scores and 15 graded evidence items.

CharteredLow Risk

Stage

0 / 8

Charter and Contribution Claim

Evidence

40%

Readiness

Citations

60%

ARGOS readiness

Will Mint

1 brain

Foundational Research Chain

The foundational-research chain every candidate must produce before defense. This candidate is queued; each artifact appears here as its stage completes.

  1. Prospectus & data-provenance charterStage 0

    Queued

  2. Multi-perspective interrogation (mind-map, open questions, grounded claims)Stage 0.75

    Queued

  3. Provenance-tagged research corpusPhase 1

    Queued

  4. Dissertation (literature & PRISMA review, contribution, methods, results)Stages 1-6

    Queued

  5. ARGOS citation auditArchivist gate

    Queued

  6. Conclave defense deck (source; rendered .pptx on disk)Stage 8

    Queued

  7. SuperStack prose-integrity reportProse gate

    Queued

Defense Readiness

Pipeline progress0%
x
Evidence readiness40%
x
Citation readiness60%
x

Theory anchor

Mission Program Execution Management

ARGOS Citations (0)

No tracked citations yet.